Daily MaverickVIRUS TESTING DEMAND: Farmers call for independent FMD test result verificationPunchBREAKING: Veteran actor Olu Jacobs dies at 84The Jerusalem PostUS House passes third resolution in four months attempting to curb US military presence in IranBollywood HungamaCinépolis to distribute Anshuman Jha and Raghubir Yadav’s Om Ka Hari in theatersRTP DesportoArsenal e Liverpool avançam na Taça da Ligaוואלהחפץ חשוד אותר סמוך לבית בחדרה, הרקע ככל הנראה פליליInquirer EntertainmentEd Sheeran’s tour opening acts drop out in solidarity with MacklemoreInquirerBaste Duterte, other witnesses subpoenaed for Sara impeachment trialColliderTaylor Sheridan’s 3-Part Spy Thriller Is Officially Taking Over the WorldSouth China Morning PostSweden’s long election night ends without answers – but caution on China seems certainRTL BoulevardEchtgenote van oud-bondscoach Ronald Koeman overledenHet Laatste Nieuws“Ik heb borstkanker, maar ik heb ook een prachtig leven gehad”: in de voetbalwereld waren meneer en mevrouw Koeman zeldzaam
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Wednesday, September 16, 2026

DeepSeek AI engineer slams Anthropic, OpenAI over ‘pacing’ calls, invokes Nazi Germany

Translate

A DeepSeek engineer has issued a stark warning about the potential concentration of advanced artificial intelligence and resources in proprietary US developers Anthropic and OpenAI, intensifying a growing debate in China over calls by US industry leaders to “pace” AI development amid safety concerns.

Liu Shengyu, a DeepSeek engineer behind the company’s V4.1 models, said he did not trust Anthropic or OpenAI to make cutting-edge AI “open and affordable”, contrasting their closed-source approach with DeepSeek’s embrace of open-source models.

“I especially don’t want Anthropic to master the most advanced artificial intelligence or AGI,” he wrote in a social media post on Monday. AGI broadly refers to AI systems that match or surpass human-level intelligence.

View the original on South China Morning Post

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.