ESPN DeportesEl Porto de Santi Gimenez se mide ante el sotaneroThe Jerusalem PostPolice identified Yamam fighter Itai Persson as dead diver found in Haifa's Students BeachESPNJeter reunites with 9/11 victim's daughter as Yanks pay tribute in ceremonyRTP DesportoMarc Márquez vence corrida sprint do GP de San Marino de MotoGPוואלהסוף עצוב לחיפושים: הצוללן שנעדר בחיפה אותר ללא רוח חייםPunchTinubu mourns ex-PDP national chairman Bamanga TukurBollywood HungamaAdhyayan Suman and Divita Rai’s Main Na Raha Mera first look out, teaser to release on September 16BBC SportOsborne makes history as first female jockey to win British ClassicFootball ItaliaGattuso: ‘Nuno Tavares worthy of Real Madrid, but inheritance up in smoke’Antara NewsIndonesia calls for stronger domestic resilience at the 18th BRICSDW DeutschBRICS-Staaten fordern "maximale Zurückhaltung" in NahostStraits Times SportDortmund make it three wins from three with 3-0 victory over Paderborn
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Saturday, September 12, 2026

SAFA Election: Former CEO questions the rules ahead of Jordaan vs Zungu vote

Translate

The former SAFA CEO Mumble believes the problem goes deeper than the two candidates competing for the presidency.

He argues that the SAFA Constitution itself needs a complete overhaul to create a fairer and more balanced governance structure.

WHY DOES DENIS MUMBLE WANT THE SAFA CONSTITUTION CHANGED?

Mumble believes the current Constitution concentrates too much power in one part of the organisation and does not provide the proper balance of power.

“My opinion, no SAFA election, in my view, can be fair unless you change the SAFA Constitution,” Mumble said in an interview with Newzroom Afrika.

“The Constitution is much too toxic to run a fair election.” He also argued that the organisation needs a broader governance overhaul.

“The organisation needs a complete overhaul, as far as I’m concerned, from a governance standpoint,” he said.

“The Constitution does not comply with the FIFA standard.”

Mumble also raised concerns about the role of SAFA’s standing committees, saying their responsibilities are not clearly defined in the statutes.

One example he highlighted was the Governance Committee, which is supposed to advise SAFA on governance matters. Mumble questioned whether the committee’s role has effectively become focused mainly on running elections.

Also read: Danny Jordaan fraud case postponed again as legal battle drags on

WHAT DOES THIS MEAN FOR THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION?

Mumble believes the current structure makes it difficult for any SAFA presidential election to be completely fair.

He pointed to the fact that incumbents can start building support well before the national election, particularly through the local and regional structures.

That gives a sitting president a significant advantage over a challenger who does not have the same amount of time or influence.

Mumble believes the answer is a fundamental restructuring of the organisation.

“I think we need to sit down at some point and really redesign the entire SAFA governance structure by first starting with redesigning that Constitution,” he said.

For Mumble, the issue is therefore bigger than whether Jordaan or Zungu wins on Saturday.

He believes South African football needs structural reform that promotes better governance and creates a more balanced distribution of power.

DO YOU AGREE WITH MUMBLE?

Share your thoughts by clicking on the red comments block below.

View the original on The South African

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.