PunchNigeria@66: Okpebholo, deputy assure Edo people of safety, call for unityBollywood HungamaBigg Boss 20: Rhiti Tiwari evicted in surprise mid-week exit after captaincy task? Here’s what we know!Daily MaverickWhen VW sneezes, Nelson Mandela Bay catches a coldThe Jerusalem PostIDF gives rejection of 'NAZA' film claims, disputes civilian death ratios, AI targeting abuseRTP DesportoArgentina goleia Bolívia com Prestianni em estreia a titular e sem MessiInquirerRemulla to TBS gang: Dialogue possible, but crime must stopColliderRussell Crowe's New True Crime Thriller Is Officially Netflix’s No. 1 MovieRapplerFACT CHECK: Jonvic Remulla did not say Marcoses are ‘sure to be jailed’ after 2028Digital SpyCelebrity Traitors star is doing the BBC show to "avenge" Niko: "I stopped watching when he went"Golem.deVon Cheater erworben: User kauft gebrauchte CPU und wird in Spiel gesperrtBusiness AMNieuw Amerikaans vliegdekschip USS John F. Kennedy krijgt voorlopige goedkeuring van de marineMundo DeportivoJódar - Vallejo, en directo
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Thursday, October 1, 2026

Why did SC junk petitions vs adjusted impeachment voting threshold?

Translate

Why did SC junk petitions vs adjusted impeachment voting threshold?

In its decision, the SC cites lack of legal standing and prematurity as reasons for dismissing the legal challenges

MANILA, Philippines – The Supreme Court (SC) dismissed the petitions against the adjusted voting threshold in Vice President Sara Duterte’s impeachment trial.

The Senate impeachment court’s September 23 decision stated that the court will count only the votes of senator-judges who are “legally and factually capable” of participating in the proceedings at the time of the vote. Originally, the two-thirds voting threshold was fixed at 16 out of 24 senators.

After this decision, at least three petitions were filed before the SC last month.

But in its decision, the High Court dismissed the petitions due to lack of legal standing and prematurity.

View the original on Rappler →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.