ESPNWhite Sox's Montgomery sets single-season strikeout record with 224RTP DesportoFinalíssima em Pontevedra. Vasco Vilaça procura título mundial de triatloThe Jerusalem PostAuthenticity and Modernity Party wins Morocco vote, Islamists return to oppositionPunchPeter Obi not godfather to Soludo’s children — First Lady’s aideCNN TürkTürkiye’nin en sıcak ve en kurak yılları belli olduInquirerAfrican swine fever on pigs confirmed in Agutaya, PalawanESPN DeportesRussell le gana a Max en emocionante final en GP de AzerbaiyánObservador DesportoQuatro corpos recuperados após explosão em AtenasThe GuardianSlovenia v Scotland: Nations League – liveBBC SportRepublic of Ireland confirm Israel game will go aheadFox NewsKate Upton retires, high school football game rocked by what some say is a cheap shot & iOSU's new kicker?BBC عربيالبيت الأبيض يمنع "سي إن إن" من مرافقة ترامب على متن الطائرة الرئاسية "إير فورس وان"
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Saturday, September 26, 2026

Loss of five-month-old foetus amounts to loss of child: Allahabad HC

Translate

The Lucknow bench of the Allahabad high court has held that the death of a sufficiently developed foetus of more than five months’ gestation in a railway accident amounts to the loss of a child and warrants separate compensation.

India News
India News

The court set aside a September 26, 2023 order of the Railway Claims Tribunal, Lucknow, and directed the railways to pay an additional ₹8 lakh for the death of a seven-month-old foetus carried by a woman who died after falling from a train.

Justice Prashant Kumar passed the order recently on an appeal filed by the family members of Savitri Devi, who died in the accident.

According to the case, the woman was travelling with her two sons on the Jan Sadharan Express from Sitapur Cantt to Biswan railway station in Uttar Pradesh on June 13, 2017. While getting down from the train at Biswan station, she fell and sustained serious injuries, resulting in her death. She was around seven months pregnant and the foetus also died.

Her family approached the Railway Claims Tribunal seeking compensation. The tribunal, however, declined to award separate compensation for the unborn child, holding that the foetus could not be treated as a bona fide passenger under the Railways Act.

The high court, however, disagreed with the tribunal’s view, observing that the death of a sufficiently developed foetus could be treated as the death of a child for determining compensation.

“Since the woman was carrying a seven-month-old foetus, the unborn child had to be treated separately,” the court observed, directing the railways to pay an additional ₹8 lakh to the claimants.

The court said the amount was in accordance with the compensation prescribed under the amended Schedule to the Railway Accidents and Untoward Incidents (Compensation) Rules, 1990, and allowed the appeal.

The court further said the fact that the Railways Act does not specifically mention the term “foetus” could not absolve the railways of its statutory liability under Section 124-A of the Act in cases involving death arising from a railway accident or untoward incident.

View the original on Hindustan Times →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.