Daily MaverickCongo’s Ebola cases surpass 10,000 as fears grow of wider African spreadBollywood HungamaRanveer Singh joins CP PLUS as brand ambassador to promote Made-in-India security technologyEl ComercioEE.UU. e Israel preparan nuevos ataques contra Irán: instalaciones nucleares, misiles y drones en la miraPunchI don’t want Norwegians in US because of Nobel Peace Prize snub — TrumpInquirer EntertainmentUS rapper Macklemore launches new ‘Free Palestine Tour’ after Ed Sheeran falloutThe Jerusalem PostActivists urge voters returning to Israel to save emergency hotline numbers in case of arrestFox NewsSpeaker Johnson predicts Democrats' far-left shift will ‘juice enthusiasm’ for GOP in midtermsInquirerChief justice contender Zalameda defends gov’t officials on budget hikeZDF heuteAktuelle Pressemitteilungen des ZDFکیهان لندنصدور حکم اعدام علیه سه متهم به جاسوسی برای جمهوری اسلامی در کویتCapital FMEACC recovers Sh40m public land with three government houses in KakamegaEuronewsTurkey: tornado kills at least four workers at Antalya construction site
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Tuesday, October 27, 2026

'Unanimity doesn't mean rules were followed': Congress leader rejects ECI affidavit amid CEC row

Translate

Unanimity did not establish whether the decisions complied with the rules, the Congress said on Monday after the Election Commission of India (ECI) submitted an affidavit in Supreme Court, saying the three commissioners had unanimously approved its decisions on the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls.

“The Supreme Court should summon all the relevant records. Even if all three agreed, the core issue remains ‘Form 6’,” Congress leader Imran Masood said, questioning whether a decision could be considered lawful merely because all three Election Commissioners had agreed to it.

The remarks came even as the poll panel denied amending the statutory Form 6 used for enrolling new voters.

“The question is whether the decision was taken in accordance with the rules,” he said, adding “If all three act arbitrarily, does that mean the decision is no longer arbitrary?”

What ECI told Supreme Court

In its affidavit filed before the Supreme Court on Monday, the ECI informed the Supreme Court that all decisions relating to the special intensive revision (SIR) of electoral rolls were taken unanimously by its three members, rejecting allegations that chief election commissioner Gyanesh Kumar acted unilaterally or that the poll panel violated the law governing its decision-making process.

The poll panel also denied amending the statutory Form 6, arguing that the additional declaration required during the SIR was a separate document prescribed through its orders and not a modification of the form.

Opposition rejects ECI's affidavit

When asked whether the ECI’s affidavit was a setback for the Opposition, Masood said, “The question is about Form 6. The question is about the deletion of votes. How has the issue been resolved? The issue is not the Election Commissioner. The issue is vote theft.”

Congress leader Rahul Gandhi, meanwhile, has called for a “Save the Vote – Save the Country” march and rally at Delhi’s Ramlila Maidan on November 1. “Our votes are being stolen, and we will not tolerate this quietly under any circumstances,” he said in a post on X, urging people to join the march.

View the original on Hindustan Times →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.