Daily MaverickWHAT’S COOKING: A family-size chicken and mushroom pieThe Jerusalem PostNetanyahu condemns Israeli riots West Bank, calls to fully prosecute extremist settlers involvedBollywood HungamaShakira’s Madrid concert to stream globally on Amazon Music on October 3; celebration to spotlight women in Latin musicPunchNasarawa varsity making progress tackling insecurity around student communities — VCInquirerPoa belies Panelo claim on ‘farce’ Senate impeachment court rulingRapplerLIVE UPDATES: Impeachment trial of Vice President Sara DuterteColliderThe Best British Detective Series on Streaming Officially Returns TodaySouth China Morning PostAstraZeneca, Merck, Novo deals boost Chinese biotech as global interest growsسكاي نيوز عربيةبن غفير يتوعد بإحراق جثمان السنوار.. ويضع شرطا لتنفيذهThe South AfricanAre great white sharks finally coming back to South Africa’s waters? [video]VilaWeb[VÍDEO] Un regidor de Vox a Sabadell amenaça una regidora amb el gest de fer-li un tret al capWirtualna PolskaWybuch w placówce opiekuńczo-wychowawczej. Akcja w Elblągu
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Tuesday, September 29, 2026

Trillanes may be next witness in Duterte impeachment trial on Sept. 30

Translate
Trillanes attends impeachment trial as Baste Duterte set to testify hostile witness
Former Senator Antonio Trillanes IV arrives at the Senate as Mayor Sebastian “Baste” Duterte testifies in Vice President Sara Duterte’s impeachment trial. Screengrabbed

MANILA, Philippines — The House prosecution panel may present former Sen. Antonio Trillanes IV on Wednesday as their next witness in Vice President Sara Duterte’s impeachment trial, though presiding officer Francis Escudero advised against it.

Trillanes, expected to testify on Duterte’s alleged acquisition of funds, was originally scheduled to testify after officials from the Anti–Money Laundering Council (AMLC) and various banks. However, the House prosecution requested to move up his presentation to Wednesday.

Escudero advised the prosecution to stick to their original sequence and await the testimony of the bank and AMLC officials.

Article continues after this advertisement

“The court would like to remind the prosecution to take in advisement what the court will say: The cart cannot be put ahead of the horse. It will be best, as originally planned by the prosecutors in their motion itself, to present at the very least the AMLC officer and/or the bank officials or the bank records, given that the testimony of the former Sen. Trillanes will pertain to that,” Escudero said.

FEATURED STORIES

NEWSINFO

NEWSINFO

NEWSINFO

READ: Trillanes attends impeachment trial as Baste Duterte set to testify

Still, the presiding officer noted that the prosecution is free to call Trillanes voluntarily without a subpoena.

“I guess you can invite him tomorrow if you will indeed present him tomorrow… The court cannot prevent you from calling a witness in the proper order that you may deem fit in the course of the presentation of your evidence,” Escudero told the prosecution.

Although the defense initially objected to altering the schedule, lead defense counsel Atty. Sheila Sison announced after a brief recess that they would allow Trillanes to testify.

Article continues after this advertisement

“If we had withdrawn our objection and they want to present the former Sen. Trillanes tomorrow, then they should just do that,” Sison told the court.

Escudero reminded the court that it could still issue a ruling on the matter on Wednesday if necessary.

Article continues after this advertisement

Public prosecutor Rep. Terry Ridon explained that the prosecution intended to present the AMLC and bank executives first, but had been awaiting a court ruling issued earlier that day.

“We would have wanted to present the banks in the soonest time, but the matter relating to the admission has only been resolved today. The earliest we can request a subpoena is actually on Friday,” he said.

Ridon was referring to the prosecution’s request for Duterte to admit 104 matters regarding her and her spouse’s financial records and personal circumstances.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.

Your subscription has been successful.

The court denied the request, citing the vice president’s right against self-incrimination. /mcm

View the original on Inquirer →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.