ESPNBroncos' striking resemblance to Denver's last Super Bowl winnersPunchNorth Korea women thrash Bangladesh 10-0 in Asian Games openerInquirerManibela asks Marcos for jeepney fare hike on his birthdayDaily MaverickReimagining agricultural education as AI transforms farming and future jobsוואלה7 שנות מאסר לסייעת בגן ילדים בנתניה שהורשעה בהתעללות ב-12 פעוטותRTP DesportoDjokovic fora do top 10 ATP, Zverev ameaça SinnerThe Jerusalem PostIsrael's oldest Holocaust survivor dies at at 107 on Rosh HashanahUOLNo 1º turno, Lula sobe para 42% e Flávio Bolsonaro cai a 37%, mostra pesquisa BTG/NexusColliderOne of the Greatest Sci-Fi Books of the 21st Century Is Under 200 PagesХабрПриз за то, чего вы не сделали: соревнование по кибербезопасности для тех, кто не пишет кодکیهان لندن«توافق دفاعی مکه» موش زائید؟! چشم امید بن‌سلمان به حمایت اسرائیلThe Hollywood Reporter‘Sunday in the Park With George’ Revival Scrapped After Ariana Grande and Jonathan Bailey Exit
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Monday, September 14, 2026

High Court Bars Standard Group From Linking Charlene Ruto To KSh 2.8B Police Uniform Tender

Translate

The High Court at Milimani has issued interim orders restraining the Standard Media Group from publishing or circulating allegations linking Charlene Ruto, the daughter of President William Ruto, to a KSh 2.8 billion Kenya Police Service uniform procurement contract.

In the ruling delivered on Monday, September 14, 2026, the court restrained the media company from further disseminating the claims pending further directions on the matter.

Reputational Damage and Procurement Clarifications

The legal action followed a series of publications by the media house alleging that the firm awarded the lucrative uniform tender had ties to the First Family, further claiming that Charlene Ruto either participated in or benefitted from the deal.

Through her legal team, Charlene petitioned the court, arguing that the reports were defamatory, unfounded, and deliberately damaged her reputation by portraying her as an illegal beneficiary of public procurement contracts.

The National Police Service had previously issued a public statement refuting the allegations, clarifying that the company named in the reports—Nalitex Limited—was non-existent and had played no role in the process. Police management maintained that the procurement was conducted lawfully through competitive bidding.

Court Directives and Next Steps

In addition to the injunction against future publications, the High Court ordered the Standard Group to remove the contentious articles from its digital platforms or publish a formal retraction correcting the errors.

The media house was granted seven days to file its formal response to the petition. The court scheduled the matter for mention on October 19, 2026, to determine further directions.

View the original on Ghafla

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.