ESPN DeportesPumas saca triunfo en Puebla y sueña con LiguillaThe Jerusalem PostTrump's oil holdings surge 43% amid Iran war, raising conflict of interest concerns - reportESPNBeer-fueled Brewers take to streets, continue World Series partyInquirerSara Duterte camp rejects new cash delivery claimBollywood HungamaGaurav Khanna and Shraddha Arya starrer show gets its title; Star Plus unveils announcement promo of Dil Ki BewafaiyaanCNN TürkGüncel altın fiyatlarında son durum | 31 Ekim altın fiyatları ne kadar, çeyrek altın kaç TL? İslam Memiş’ten altın alacaklara uyarı!ZDF heuteEntdecken Sie das ZDF-NachrichtenstudioAntara NewsCilacap authorities respond to floods, landslide after heavy rainSözcüSosyal medya hesapları için karar verildi: Yarın hepsi tek tek silinecekCNN بالعربيةاليمن.. فيديو عمليات استهداف مقاتلين حوثيين تنشره وزارة الإعلامMalay MailMalaysian banks must back bunkering players or lose business to Singapore, says industry leaderEl Comercio“Es mentira lo que dice”: Familia de anciana atropellada por hijo de Leslie Stewart niega haberle pedido S/ 50,000
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Saturday, October 31, 2026

'Does A Man Not Have Right To End Relationship?' Supreme Court On False Rape Cases

Translate

The Supreme Court has expressed concern about a rising trend of consensual sexual encounters being reframed as sexual assault and asked whether a man does not have the right to end a relationship.

Acquitting a man accused of rape, a bench of Justices BV Nagarathna and R Mahadevan said society and courts must discourage the weaponisation of criminal law following emotional discord between two consenting adults.

"We wish to note a worrying trend in recent years wherein consensual relationships that have come to an end are retrospectively combed with a fine tooth so as to identify what can post-facto be construed as violence and sexual assault," the bench said.

The judges distinguished between cases where consent was obtained through deceit or falsehood from the very beginning and situations where an individual might simply harbour regret over past consensual sexual encounters after a relationship has concluded.

The bench clarified that the termination of a relationship cannot render previously consensual sexual relations criminal and asserted that doing so could infringe upon an individual's personal liberty and reputation.

The court also noted that such an approach effectively strips a man of his right to make his own decisions.

"In fact, such an approach denudes the man of any agency entirely, as the mere factum of being in a consensual relationship at one point would bind him to it entirely for fear of being accused of rape at a subsequent point of time ," the bench noted, adding, "In such a scenario, can it be said that the man had no right to withdraw from the relationship? Can such a decision be termed as deceit or fraud? Clearly not."

Noting that it has frequently encountered cases where failed relationships are transformed into criminal prosecutions, the court emphasised that rape is a grave offence, and the charge should be reserved for instances involving actual sexual violence, coercion, or cases where consent was obtained through deception.

Converting every broken, consensual relationship into a rape charge undermines the nature and gravity of this serious crime, the judges emphasised.

Cases Unreported

At the same time, the court acknowledged that a significant number of rape cases still go unreported and that many victims choose to remain silent to protect their own reputation and those of their families.

"Therefore, in instances where the facts clearly point to sexual violence or assault, such genuine cases must be investigated thoroughly and prosecuted," the judges stressed.

View the original on NDTV →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.