CNN TürkSON DAKİKA... Milas Belediye Başkanı Fevzi Topuz tutuklandıThe Jerusalem Post'Not a gradual slide': Menopause can reshape women's bodies in a sudden shift, Israeli study findsPunchMorning recap: Ebola updates, looming petrol price hike, Lagos building collapse, other top stories한겨레오늘 프랑스서 700건 넘는 시위 예정…파리 지하철 24곳 폐쇄GhaflaKenya Power Announces Saturday Outages in Nyeri and Kiambu CountiesZDF heuteAktuelle Pressemitteilungen des ZDF7sur7Standard & Poor’s maintient la note de la BelgiqueIl Fatto QuotidianoMistero fitto sul nuovo James Bond, la rosa dei candidati si stringe ma la produzione ha la bocca cucita. Ecco quale sarà l’identikit dell’agente 007FotogramasTom Cruise, sobre Paul Newman: "Nunca he olvidado y, literalmente, nunca olvidaré lo que me dijo sobre qué ropa tenía que llevar en un rodaje"Het Laatste Nieuws“Mensen hebben het lastig, ik wil helpen”: mysterieuze Batman laat automobilisten gratis tanken en betaalt parkeerboetes in buurt van ziekenhuizenAntara NewsBali, Timor-Leste explore deal for cattle exports20 MinutenWollte Abkürzung nehmen: 24-Jähriger stirbt beim Bahnhof Aarau
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Saturday, October 24, 2026

Court affirms ruling vs Revilla’s bid to inhibit justice who denied bail

Translate
Court affirms ruling vs Revilla’s bid to inhibit justice who denied bail

MANILA, Philippines — The Sandiganbayan Third Division affirmed its earlier ruling to deny the move of former Sen. Bong Revilla  to bar its chairperson, Associate Justice Karl Miranda, the sole judge who denied his bail petition, from participating in the trial of his malversation case.

In a ruling promulgated on Oct 22 but was only furnished on Friday, the Third Division denied the motion for reconsideration filed by Revilla on the Sept. 24 resolution of the court.

READ: Court junks Revilla motion to inhibit justice who denied his bail bid

Article continues after this advertisement

“The court found the Motion for Reconsideration to be without merit and, accordingly, affirmed the denial of Revilla’s Second Motion for Inhibition,” the court said in a statement.

FEATURED STORIES

NEWSINFO

NEWSINFO

NEWSINFO

According to the court, Revilla’s points in his MR have already been addressed last Sept. 24.

“Revilla had not provided any new or additional act, conduct, or circumstance that could be considered as clear and convincing evidence of Justice Miranda’s bias and prejudice that would warrant his recusal from hearing the instant case,” it said in a statement.

Revilla’s second Motion for Inhibition sought to ask Miranda to inhibit from participating in the trial of the former senator and six of his co-accused stemming from alleged ghost flood control project of the Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH) in Pandi, Bulacan worth P92.8 million.

In this motion, Revilla cited that Miranda is related to counsel of state witness and former DPWH Undersecretary Roberto Bernardo; that the justice relied heavily on Bernardo’s testimony; and that he allegedly showed prejudgement before voting to deny the former senator’s bail.

Article continues after this advertisement

In February, the Third Division already denied Revilla’s first motion for inhibition against Miranda.

Revilla is out on P1 million bail after the Third Division voted 2-1 for the former senator’s provisional liberty.

Article continues after this advertisement

Associate Justice Ronald Moreno and Associate Justice Fritz Bryn Delos Santos voted to grant Revilla’s bail.  /gsg

View the original on Inquirer →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.