Daily MaverickWHAT’S COOKING: Pork belly and crackling with red grapes and fennelCNN TürkBolu Dağı geçişinde yoğun sisPunchArmy activates three formations in Kebbi to boost securityBollywood HungamaRajkummar Rao becomes brand ambassador for footwear label RANNRThe Jerusalem PostFlydubai flight to Tel Aviv lands in Saudi Arabia, Israel says pilot tried to hijack planeInquirerZamboanga del Sur launches tourism website, tourist policeESPNJJ Gabriel and the 'nightmare' battle for Premier League academy talentColliderNetflix’s Cult Classic Sci-Fi Series Is Officially a Global Streaming JuggernautSCMP China4-winged fossil found in Liaoning challenges single origin of dinosaur flightDeadlineBBC Studios Scripted Boss Spotlights Strategy Behind Indie & Talent Deals: “We’re Not Going To Spend Millions Buying A Production Company”RapplerFACT CHECK: No P50-M fine on users for improper social media use under House billХабрКак складывается доверие к бренду в цифровой среде
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Wednesday, September 30, 2026

SC junks petitions challenging Sara Duterte impeachment voting threshold

Translate

Make this your preferred source to get more updates from this publisher on Google.

The Supreme Court (SC) on Wednesday dismissed separate petitions challenging the Senate impeachment court’s ruling to base the voting threshold for Vice President Sara Duterte’s conviction on the number of senators who are participating in the proceedings.

According to the court, the SC En Banc dismissed the petitions filed by former Executive Secretary Vic Rodriguez, Berteni Causing, and lawyer Ernesto Francisco Jr. on procedural grounds, including lack of standing and prematurity.

Last week, the impeachment court voted to base the two-thirds of votes required for conviction on the number of senators who are capable of "legally and factually participating in the impeachment proceedings."

This is because the 1987 Constitution states that "no person shall be convicted without the concurrence of two-thirds of all the Members of the Senate."

The three petitioners sought the issuance of a temporary restraining order (TRO) or status quo ante order (SQAO) against the ruling’s implementation.

Rodriguez also asked the SC to nullify the ruling, arguing that the impeachment court effectively amended the Constitution by adding a qualification not found in its text.

For their part, Causing and Francisco argued that senators who remain in office should be counted even if they are in hiding, detained, or medically unable to attend.

Causing asked the SC to compel Senators Jinggoy Estrada, Rodante Marcoleta, and Ronald “Bato” Dela ROsa to participate in the trial and for the Senate to take the necessary steps to ensure their attendance.

Marcoleta is detained over a P75-million plunder case while Estrada is detained over a P573-million plunder charge, which is a non-bailable offense.

Dela Rosa, meanwhile, has not appeared in public since his departure from the Senate premises on May 14, after authorities attempted to serve an International Criminal Court warrant against him. —AOL, GMA News

View the original on GMA News →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.