וואלהבמהלך חג הסוכות תוגבל כניסה למטיילים במשטחי אימונים בדרוםBollywood HungamaEXCLUSIVE: Ajay Devgn-Rohit Jugraj’s horror thriller titled SuryasparshThe Jerusalem Post'No cure for stupidity': Israel's Football Association blasts Irish coach's calls to boycott matchInquirer EntertainmentJopay Paguia ‘respects’ Rochelle Pangilinan, but stands firm on her work ethicRTP DesportoCorridas de Fórmula 1 mais curtas a partir de 2027InquirerDOTr chief: Gov’t acting on effects of fuel prices on transport sectorХабрAnemic vs Rich entities: нечестная дилеммаThe South AfricanThree children rescued after being caught in a rip currentVanguardRussia demands Europe lifts sanctions against all RussiansRTL BoulevardVerdediger Timber slaat ook tweede training Oranje overSouth China Morning PostTurkey student arrested after 11 injured in shotgun shootingVilaWebUn rastre de fa 30 milions d’anys: descobreixen vuit petjades fossilitzades d’èquids al castell de Cervera
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Tuesday, September 22, 2026

14-year-old Tacloban shooting suspect remains in rehab facility

Translate
14-year-old Tacloban shooting suspect remains in rehab facility
The Department of Social Welfare and Development rehabilitation facility in Tanauan, Leyte, where two minors involved in the June 22, 2026 shooting at San Jose National High School in Tacloban City remain under DSWD custody. The agency said Tuesday, Sept. 22, 2026, that both minors continue to undergo assessment and intervention. (DSWD Photo)

TACLOBAN CITY – The 14-year-old boy identified by authorities as one of the suspects in the June 22 shooting at San Jose National High School (SJNHS) here remains under the custody of the Department of Social Welfare and Development (DSWD) at a rehabilitation facility in Tanauan, Leyte, a regional official said.

DSWD Eastern Visayas Regional Director Grace Subong stated this following reports that the boy, identified only by the alias “Nash,” was no longer at the facility.

“As far as we are concerned, the 14-year-old is still with DSWD at the rehabilitation facility, including the 15-year-old, and both continue to undergo assessment and interventions,” Subong said in a media interview.

Article continues after this advertisement

READ: Tacloban prosecs to file criminal raps vs 15-yr-old boy over school shooting

FEATURED STORIES

NEWSINFO

NEWSINFO

NEWSINFO

The clarification came after the parents of the three students killed in the shooting sought assurance that the younger suspect remained at the facility.

The parents also asked to see the 14-year-old, but the DSWD reportedly turned down their request.

Erbea Fabia, mother of slain student Cris Lorenz Fabian, said the parents were not seeking to enter the facility but only wanted confirmation that the boy remained under DSWD custody.

“We will not go inside the facility, even if we are from afar. All we want is an assurance that he is still there,” Fabia said.

Article continues after this advertisement

Subong said access to the facility is restricted to protect the welfare and security of other minors under DSWD care.

“We have to protect others, not just them. Rest assured that we will provide updates on the status of the two minors,” Subong said.

Article continues after this advertisement

She also emphasized that the facility focuses on the children’s rehabilitation. Some of them have been able to continue their education and even graduate from college, she added.

The two minors were placed under DSWD custody following the June 22 shooting at SJNHS that left three students dead and several others injured.

Witnesses identified the 14-year-old as the alleged shooter, while the 15-year-old was charged with murder and multiple counts of serious physical injuries.

The different legal treatment is due to the country’s juvenile justice system.

Under Republic Act No. 9344, or the Juvenile Justice and Welfare Act of 2006, a child aged15 years old or below at the time of the commission of an offense is exempt from criminal liability. A child above 15 but below 18 may be held criminally liable if the child acted with discernment.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.

Your subscription has been successful.

Exemption from criminal liability does not mean that a child is released without intervention. The law provides for appropriate intervention and rehabilitation measures for children in conflict with the law, with emphasis on their welfare and rehabilitation./coa

View the original on Inquirer

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.