PunchJAMB will now handle all HND admissions in polytechnics — NBTECNN Türk13 EYLÜL YAYIN AKIŞI: Bugün televizyonda hangi diziler, filmler, programlar var?The Jerusalem PostIDF warns of rising West Bank tensions despite low terror levels, pushes for preventive operationsInquirerMaguindanao Sur officials turn over loose guns yielded by constituentsESPNTransfer rumors, news: Liverpool look at Inter's Stankovicוואלהדיווחים ברשתות האיראניות: כלי שיט נפגע מירי בסמוך לאי קשםSouth China Morning PostBangladesh draws closer to China in ‘political chessboard’ to balance India tiesCollider‘Landman’ Star Billy Bob Thornton’s Twisted Crime Thriller Is Officially Streaming for FreeCumhuriyetMeksika’da kartellerin yeni yöntemi: Gizli kripto para çiftlikleriRappler[Tech Thoughts] The Jurassic Parkification of AI chatbotsThe Hollywood Reporter‘Look Back’ Breakouts Furi Nanase and Rokka Okada on Growing Up on a Hirokazu Koreeda SetHipertextualLa nueva IA de IBM y la NASA es de código abierto y promete revolucionar la exploración lunar
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Sunday, September 13, 2026

Steve Jobs bought a 30-room mansion in 1984; it was demolished in 201

Translate

In 1984, Steve Jobs bought a 30-room, 17,250-sq-ft California mansion; after years of legal battles, it was demolished in 2011, while its pipe organ and historic fixtures were salvaged

The house was commissioned in the 1920s by Daniel C. Jackling, a self-made copper millionaire whose business transformed the American copper industry.

For a house that once embodied California wealth and architectural ambition, the end came not with a grand renovation but with bulldozers. The Jackling House, a sprawling Spanish Colonial Revival mansion in the wealthy Silicon Valley town of Woodside, became the center of a years-long fight between Steve Jobs and preservationists.

According to an online report by Fortune and Architectural Record, Jobs wanted it gone and hoped to replace it with a smaller, more modern home. Preservationists saw something very different: a rare piece of California architectural history worth saving. In the end, Jobs got his way. The 17,250-square-foot mansion was demolished in 2011, although many of its historic fixtures were salvaged before the building disappeared.

A grand home with an unusual past

The house was commissioned in the 1920s by Daniel C. Jackling, a self-made copper millionaire whose business transformed the American copper industry. Architect George Washington Smith designed the residence, drawing on Spanish and Andalusian influences to create a massive white-stucco estate with the character of an old European village, states the online report.Built in 1926, the mansion featured 30 rooms, including 14 bedrooms, and occupied six acres.

Its construction incorporated a distinctive double-wall system designed to provide insulation while giving the structure the heavy appearance of traditional adobe buildings.Inside, the house was equally elaborate. Thousands of handmade Tunisian and Spanish tiles covered parts of the interior, while dark timber beams, wide-plank white oak floors, custom copper hardware and ornate chandeliers added to its old-world character and according to a report by the Fortune, an aeolian pipe organ was among its most unusual features.

Jobs takes on the mansion

Because the mansion was more than 50 years old, its proposed demolition came under review through California's environmental and historic preservation laws.

Because the mansion was more than 50 years old, its proposed demolition came under review through California's environmental and historic preservation laws.

According to Architectural Record, Jobs purchased the property in 1984, when he was 29 and Apple was preparing to launch the Macintosh. He reportedly paid about $2 million for the estate and lived there for roughly a decade before eventually moving to Palo Alto. Despite its architectural pedigree, Jobs disliked the sprawling mansion and considered it impractical for his lifestyle. He eventually envisioned replacing it with a much smaller residence designed around his own preferences and the needs of his family.

A battle over preservation

Because the mansion was more than 50 years old, its proposed demolition came under review through California's environmental and historic preservation laws. A subsequent assessment determined that the property was eligible for the California Register of Historical Resources. Preservationists organized against the demolition, arguing that Smith's work represented an important chapter in American architecture.

The dispute moved through the courts, reaching the California Supreme Court after an earlier demolition attempt was challenged, adds the online report.Jobs also offered an alternative, where anyone willing to relocate the enormous house could potentially take it. Several preservation-minded parties explored the possibility, but the relocation plans never came together. As the legal battle continued, the empty property deteriorated.

The house sat largely unused, exposed to the elements and increasingly difficult to restore.

The mansion comes down

By 2008, Jobs had revised his plans and again sought permission to demolish the structure. The proposal compared the cost and difficulty of restoring the deteriorated mansion with building a significantly smaller replacement home and this time, the legal challenge failed. The demolition permit was eventually issued, and in 2011 the Jackling House was reduced to rubble, ending one of Silicon Valley's most unusual preservation disputes.Yet the story did not end entirely with the wrecking equipment. Many of the home's historic fittings were removed and preserved, including Victorian-era marble sinks, handmade tiles and other architectural elements. The famous pipe organ was also salvaged. The mansion itself was gone, but pieces of its history survived, scattered remnants of a grand California estate that had spent years caught between preservation and the desire to build something new.Images Courtesy: Facebook, Architectural Records, and SFGATE

View the original on Times of India

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.