InquirerManibela to go on strike Sept. 14-15 over fuel price increasesThe Jerusalem PostOne dead, more than 30 missing after Vanuatu ferry sinks, Prime Minister Jotham Napat's office saysESPN DeportesAmérica se desmorona ante Cruz Azul que busca la goleadaESPNMessi scores, but Nashville strikes late to deny Miami win한겨레웃자고 해본 게 진짜가 됐다…데뷔곡 낸 효리수·뮤지컬 무대 선 이창호Inquirer EntertainmentLOOK: 8 celebrities who hopped on the ’80s AI photo trendSözcüİstanbul'da operasyon gecesi: Ünlü mekanlara peş peşe baskınCNN TürkİSTANBUL TRAFİĞE KAPALI YOLLAR 13 Eylül: İstanbul'da hangi yollar trafiğe kapalı, ne zaman açılacak? Alternatif güzergahlar neler?Daily MailQueen Elizabeth's dresser Angela Kelly 'signs up for TV documentary' - and insider reveals 'royals will be worried... and they are right to be'Capital FMGachagua links Embu violence to 2027 Mt Kenya succession politics3DNewsГлава Anthropic предложил замедлить развитие ИИ, эту идею поддержали Сэм Альтман и Илон Маскالنهارالسلطات التركية تحجب حسابات ناشطين من مجتمع الميم
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Sunday, September 13, 2026

‘Slipped and fell’ on saleswoman, then kissed her twice: Mumbai man gets 1-year jail

Translate

‘Slipped and fell’ on saleswoman, then kissed her twice: Mumbai man gets 1-year jail

AI Generated Image Used For Representational Purpose Only

MUMBAI: Ruling that a natural reaction to a fall does not involve kissing the victim, a sessions court convicted and sentenced to one year rigorous imprisonment a 34-year-old cleaner who claimed he ac­cidentally “slipped and fe­ll” onto a saleswoman at a Borivli (W) mall be­fore forcibly kissing her twice last year.In a trial that lasted only 2 months, dismissing the defence, the court found Ritesh Armulla guilty of using criminal force and making unwelcome physical contact with explicit sexual overtures.“Even for the sake of arg­ument, if it is considered a pe­r­son slipped and fell on an­ot­h­er person, the natural re­ac­ti­on would be different fr­om the person kissing the person on whom he fell,” judge said.

‘Enough proof that act was intentional’

The offences are covered under Sections 74, assault or use of criminal force against a woman with intent to outrage, or knowing it is likely to outrage, her modesty, and 75, sexual harassment, of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.Additional Sessions Judge P A Sane said the victim’s evidence was “convincing” and not disbelievable. “There is nothing coming on record as to why the victim will depose against the accused. Moreover, it is coming on record that she did not know the accused before the incident. So there is no possibility that she would falsely involve the accused in this case,” the judge held.This is one of the few convictions since the BNS replaced the IPC.

The court sentenced Armulla to one year’s RI and a fine of Rs 1,000 under Section 74, and one year’s simple imprisonment and a fine of Rs 500 under Section 75. Both sentences will run concurrently. The judge said there was sufficient reason to believe that the accused intentionally kissed the complainant, made her fall and kissed her again, amounting to outraging modesty by criminal force. He had followed her on the pretext of being shown the washroom and physically contacted her with explicit sexual overtures.The case arose from an incident on Sept 17, 2025, at a mall in Borivli West. The victim, a sales girl at the mall, told the court that around 6 pm she was on duty and walking towards billing counter number 6 after taking a cold drink bottle. A man in a pink shirt approached her and asked where the washroom was. She pointed in that direction, but he repeatedly asked her to show him.According to the prosecution, after she asked him to go ahead, he left briefly and returned.

The victim said the accused came from behind, knocked against her, asked her to take him to the washroom and, when she refused and proceeded towards the billing counter, forcibly kissed her, caused her to fall and kissed her again. Staff and other people in the mall caught him. Police were called, and he was taken into custody the same day.The FIR was lodged immediately. Police prepared the spot panchnama, arrested Armulla, recorded statements and collected CCTV footage.

The chargesheet was filed on November 11, 2025, and charges were framed on July 4, 2026.The prosecution examined the victim, an eyewitness, the investigating officer and a mall employee linked to the CCTV footage. The victim identified Armulla in court, and the eyewitness supported her account.The defence questioned proof of the CCTV footage, non-examination of a mall official, absence of hash value and intent, claiming any contact may have been accidental. The court found the oral evidence sufficient and granted set-off for custody already undergone since arrest.

View the original on Times of India

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.