The Jerusalem PostGoogle's use of press by AI chatbot may infringe copyright rules, EU court adviser saysPunchSokoto pledges stronger security partnershipsDaily MaverickADMINISTRATIVE CHAOS: Athletics SA moves rapidly to implement World Athletics leadership overhaul directiveBollywood HungamaKaran Tacker to begin shooting for Bhay: The Gaurav Tiwari Mystery Season 2 in MarchSky TG24Elezioni Midterm 2026, oggi il voto di metà mandato negli Stati Uniti. DIRETTAInquirerPCG logs over 83,000 passengers at ports after UndasZDF heuteAktuelle Pressemitteilungen des ZDFStraits Times SportSacred Command can break runner-up jinxSouth China Morning PostJournalists may need judicial review to access land records under new rulesBBC عربيوساطات "مكوكية" لتجنب جولة حرب جديدة في المنطقة، وإيران تقول إن "إصبعها على الزناد"TagesschauLiveblog zu den Midterms: ++ US-Bürger wählen neuen Kongress ++Il Fatto QuotidianoJesús de Miguel morto, il video dell’impatto fatale in campo: il colpo del portiere Owono, poi la corsa dei medici
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Tuesday, November 3, 2026

Socceroos, Matildas take Football Australia to court

Translate

Socceroos and Matildas stars are taking legal action against Football Australia (FA) as part of a multi-million-dollar dispute between the governing body and its national team players.

AAP understands the players' union, Professional Footballers Australia (PFA), is pursuing FA for a seven-figure claim on behalf of the players in the NSW Supreme Court.

The union is expected to argue the revenue share agreement between the governing body and national team players is not being serviced properly.

The central issue is believed to centre on FA's commercial deals and whether players are getting a fair share of FA revenues.

As part of the existing collective bargaining agreement (CBA), which was signed in 2023, Socceroos and Matildas players receive a share of FA's national team revenues.

A group of Socceroos players lean in together as they stand in a circle ahead of a game.

The central issue is believed to be the FA's commercial deals and whether players are getting a fair share of FA revenues. (Getty Images: Robert Cianflone)

Registration fees or sponsors for junior participation programs are strictly off-limits to senior national team players.

But anything relating to the Socceroos and Matildas, such as ticketing, broadcast or sponsorship, makes its way back into players' pockets.

National teams contribute up to half of FA's revenues, with players receiving an 18 to 20 per cent cut of all relevant commercial arrangements.

There are also mechanisms in the pay agreement that incentivise players and FA to work together and push for more, allowing both sides to share the spoils of stronger deals.

But the players feel they are not getting their fair share, with the PFA launching legal action in the NSW Supreme Court on their behalf.

String of legal actions against FA

The dispute is the latest high-profile legal action against FA, which settled out of court with Macarthur FC over claims the club was misled by the governing body in the lead-up to its A-League entry in 2020.

FA also recently settled an unfair dismissal case with former chief football officer Ernie Merrick.

The legal dispute with players comes ahead of Socceroos matches in the Middle East during the November window, where tensions are expected to be heightened by the conflict in the region.

Tony Popovic is expected to name his squad later this week to travel to Doha to face Qatar before tackling Jordan in Amman amid a backdrop of increased security concerns.

The Matildas will host Colombia in a two-friendly series in Canberra and Geelong later this month.

Female soccer players rejoyce after scoring a goal, celebrating with a hug on the pitch

The Matildas beat Haiti 7–1 in October. (Getty Images: Football Australia/Catherine Steenkeste)

And the ill-feeling between the players and the governing body comes in the lead-up to the expiry of the current CBA, which is due to lapse in September next year.

Talks are yet to commence over new terms, following an impasse between the PFA and the A-Leagues over a pay deal earlier this year.

The PFA declined to comment, while FA did not respond to requests for comment.

View the original on ABC News (Australia) →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.