The Jerusalem PostCuba says US contacts fall short of formal talks as Trump pressure mountsESPNFollow live: Rays add to lead vs. YankeesESPN Deportes¿Cómo fue el debut de Karim López en pretemporada?InquirerZamboanga del Norte town extends class suspensions amid rains한겨레공수처, 여당 ‘대통령·국회의원 수사 제외’ 추진에 “견제 구조의 퇴보”ZDF heuteEntdecken Sie das ZDF-Nachrichtenstudio20 MinutenDer Tinder Swindler will eigene Dating-App auf den Markt bringenSoompiSong Ji Ho And Kim So Ri Announce MarriageCNN بالعربيةما آخر جهود CNN وMSNBC وPolitico في قضية "حظر البيت الأبيض"؟Daily MailRange Rover driven by 16-year-old that smashed into Nobu chef is owned by legendary Hollywood composer Harry Gregson-Williams中国新闻网“饭困”“晕碳”就是胰岛素抵抗?The Sydney Morning HeraldMonash Freeway chaos as specialist police arrest six after dramatic pursuit
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Tuesday, October 6, 2026

Defense team did not intend to threaten anyone – Poa

Translate
Defense welcomes criticism of its cross-examination strategy
Defense spokesperson Atty. Michael Poa —Inquirer photo/Niño Jesus Orbeta

MANILA, Philippines — It was not the intent of Vice President Sara Duterte’s defense team to threaten any party when one of its counsel pointed out possible violations of bank secrecy laws in presenting Anti-Money Laundering Council (AMLC) documents before the Senate impeachment court, said defense spokesperson Atty. Michael Poa.

Poa made the pronouncement after the conclusion of the 33rd day of Duterte’s impeachment trial on Monday, which got heated on the part of the defense after four senator-judges called out one of its counsel, Atty. Mark Vinluan.

READ: ‘Walang takutan:’ 4 senator-judges call out Sara Duterte’s lawyer

Article continues after this advertisement

Vinluan raised possible administrative and criminal liability against those who disclose and report confidential information, including the media, during his cross-examination of AMLC secretariat executive director Ronel Buenaventura—which to some senator-judges, bordered on intimidation.

FEATURED STORIES

NEWSINFO

NEWSINFO

NEWSINFO

“We regret that they felt that way. I think for Attorney Vinluan, that was not the intention. I think he was just reading the law and he just wanted to raise that with the witness,” Poa said in a chance interview.

“But again, we regret if any senator felt that way because, as you know, it’s not the intention to threaten anyone,” he added.

Asked if the defense already has plans to make amends on how the senator-judges perceived his cross examination, Poa responded with uncertainty, pointing out that it is up to Vinluan to lead their cross.

“The defense really did not intend to threaten anyone, or at least create a perception of threatening anyone and that, of course, includes the senator judges, the witnesses, and even the media,” reiterated Poa.

Article continues after this advertisement

Senator-judge Raffy Tulfo was among those who took the floor and called out Vinluan, reminding him that the Senate impeachment court had already allowed the disclosure of AMLC records during the trial.

He went as far as telling the defense lawyer to give the court a break and not to intimidate anyone.

Article continues after this advertisement

Senator-judge Francis “Kiko” Pangilinan, for his part, shared Tulfo’s sentiments by stating that Vinluan’s argument was “uncalled for.”

For Senator-judge Risa Hontiveros, it was wrong for Vinluan to “even indirectly” threaten the media, adding that there should be no “chilling effect” on the “Fourth Estate.” /cb

View the original on Inquirer →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.