The Jerusalem PostPalestinian teacher arrested in West Bank over posts praising terrorists, October 7 attackPunchUsor suffers injury scare after UCL assistCNN TürkBerlin'de esrarengiz ölüm! Alman Bakan otel odasında ölü bulunduInquirerSara Duterte’s lawyers: We respect Sarmiento’s refusal to testify한겨레중수청·경찰, ‘내란 특수본’ 구성 논의…공동본부장 체계도 검토ZDF heuteEntdecken Sie das ZDF-NachrichtenstudioNew Straits TimesBoy, 6, drowned while fishing alone in Kulai pond, police rule out foul playCNN BrasilJorginho vê Flamengo perto de ‘objetivo’ no Brasileirão: “Falta pouco”경향신문설악산·오대산 탐방로 통제···산불 예방 위해 15일~12월 15일 고지대 출입 제한自由時報被通緝還能辦雙城論壇?沈伯洋談「中國的彈性」:表面功夫打壓一定會有ESPN Deportes¿Rafa Márquez se juega su futuro en la Nations League?سكاي نيوز عربيةرغم الحديث عن التخلي عنه بعد الهزيمة.. ترامب يتمسك بهيغسيث
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Thursday, November 5, 2026

Trump’s Supreme Court winning streak in election cases screeches to a halt

Translate
The U.S. Supreme Court's justices acted with remarkable speed to shut down President Donald Trump's attempt to intervene in California's ballot count on the eve of Tuesday's midterm elections.

The U.S. Supreme Court's justices acted with remarkable speed to shut down President Donald Trump's attempt to intervene in California's ballot count on the eve of Tuesday's midterm elections. | REUTERS

Nov 4, 2026

WASHINGTON – Six hours and 24 minutes. That is how long it took the U.S. Supreme Court’s justices to shut down President Donald Trump’s attempt to intervene in California’s ballot count on the eve of Tuesday’s midterm elections.

Usually, the institution takes its time with decisions — mostly over months but even in emergency actions, over weeks — but on Monday, the justices acted with remarkable speed. They gave the administration’s case the same kind of unceremonious treatment sometimes exhibited in matters they apparently deem unworthy of the top U.S. judicial body’s attention.

The court’s decision to deny the administration’s request to temporarily block California from counting mail-in ballots from more than 20,000 registered voters who federal officials allege are likely non-U.S. citizens came in a brief, one-sentence order. The court offered no explanation for its decision, and there were no publicly noted dissents among the justices.

In a time of both misinformation and too much information,
quality journalism is more crucial than ever.
By subscribing, you can help us get the story right.

View the original on The Japan Times →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.