ESPN DeportesGuardiola rompe su silencio tras cargos contra el Manchester City Daily MaverickMade with purpose: A collaboration creating opportunities for young South Africans ESPNClark’s signature shoe: How the 'Caitlin 1' blends function and individuality The Jerusalem PostTeacher doused in petrol as students set fire to schools in protests raging across France RTP DesportoMundial feminino. Selecionador antevê "jogos bastante competitivos" com Irlanda HipertextualNaughty Dog ya trabaja en ‘Uncharted 5’ y se filtran los primeros detalles RMF24Grzeczni i niegrzeczni. Pentagon wykluczył sojuszników ze spotkania w Polsce Screen RantBrendan Fraser’s The Mummy Is Resurrected As One Of The Biggest Movies In The World tazUm- und Abbau im ÖRR: Schall und Rauch Antara NewsTwo energy transition agendas converge on Rengit Island Wirtualna PolskaPostrzelony policjant zmarł w szpitalu. Jest zarzut zabójstwa

Inquirer·Philippines·

DOJ scrutinizes Gracioso Jr. affidavit: We don’t want weak cases

Translate

Tetch Torres-Tupas

DOJ scrutinizes Gracioso Jr. affidavit: We don't want weak cases — Dismissed police officer Rodulfo Gracioso Jr. appears before the NBI, bringing “evidence,” such as photos of himself with Vice President Sara Duterte. (INQUIRER.net / Mary Joy Salcedo)

MANILA, Philippines – The Department of Justice (DOJ) is assessing the sworn statement of former police officer Rodulfo Gracioso Jr., applying the legal principle of the “totality of circumstances” in ensuring that any prospective criminal charges or witness protection coverage will hold up under judicial scrutiny.

Justice Secretary Fredderick Vida said the DOJ received Gracioso’s affidavit from the National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) late last week.

Vida explained that the NBI and the DOJ are conducting a parallel review of the affidavit so that, if it reaches the court, it can withstand scrutiny

Article continues after this advertisement

“The NBI has its mandate as investigators,” Vida explained.

FEATURED STORIES

NEWSINFO

NEWSINFO

NEWSINFO

“For us at the DOJ, the lens we use is twofold: whether the individual qualifies for our protection program, and whether the testimony satisfies all legal elements required to build a solid criminal case that can withstand cross-examination in court,” he added.

Addressing queries about the witness’ background and potential credibility issues, such as possible involvement in illegal activities, Vida said such background is not uncommon among key witnesses.

“In our experience, people involved in these schemes aren’t always clean—they may have participated in the wrongdoings, acted as bagmen, or been part of bribery arrangements,” Vida explained

“All of these factor into our evaluation, alongside the person’s motivation and the overall factual setting.”

Article continues after this advertisement

Vida stressed that the department is actively verifying material points of the statement against open-source reports and external corroboration, noting that some public information supports the claims while other aspects remain disputed.

“We don’t want to file weak cases,” Vida emphasized.

Article continues after this advertisement

“The goal is to ensure that whatever case is brought forward will stand the test of a judge and survive rigorous cross-examination,” Vida added. /gsg

View the original on Inquirer →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.