Daily MaverickJoburg crisis cannot be solved without competent City leadershipESPNPremier League depth charts for most popular teams: Who is key?The Jerusalem PostWho will teach the next generation?PunchNigeria@66: 2027 election will test our democratic maturity – JonathanBollywood HungamaDisha Patani completes a decade in Bollywood as MS Dhoni: The Untold Story turns 10: “Beyond grateful ”InquirerBukidnon’s Quezon town marks 10th Senior Citizens’ DayGhaflaImages reveal extent of Wicknell Chivayo helicopter crash wreckageIl Fatto Quotidiano“Il lusso? Se c’è non me lo nego ma non lo cerco. Non ho lo yatch di 40 metri o la Lamborghini. Il mio aspetto? C’è il fascino sottile della decomposizione delle carni”: Paolo Bonolis si racconta3DNewsЯпонский Google изобрёл вертикальную клавиатуру-конвейер Gboard Kuru-Kuru — построить её может любой желающийسكاي نيوز عربيةاستطلاع يفجر مفاجأة بشأن رونالدو.. ماذا يريد مشجعو البرتغال؟RTBF InfoDes feux et dégradations lors d'un mouvement spontané d'élèves devant plusieurs écoles de LiègeBBC News BrasilGoogle remove mais de 40 canais com falsos médicos de IA após reportagens da BBC News Brasil
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Thursday, October 1, 2026

Unfair method of splitting pensions can add to the pain of divorce | Letters

Translate

Your article on the impact of the escalating cost of living on divorce settlements (Unhappy couples staying put due to cost of living crisis, say divorce lawyers, 23 September) provides a timely reminder of the financial inequities facing many separating couples.

As a pensions expert, I have regularly encountered a particular imbalance in the splitting of pension assets on divorce. Although the last Labour government enabled pension savings to be taken into account in divorce settlements, there remains, 25 years on, an inherent unfairness in the way many such arrangements are implemented.

Where one partner (usually the husband) has built up valuable pension entitlements through a defined benefit pension, the allocation of those assets on divorce is often based on an equivalent cash value at the point of divorce, known as “external sharing”.

In thousands of such cases, especially those involving private sector pensions, this leads to the undervaluing of pension assets transferred – usually to the wife and, in some cases, by many thousands of pounds.

Divorce is a traumatic enough experience. This fundamental flaw in the legal process compounds unfairness and is both unnecessary and easily rectified. The government should address this urgently to avoid sleepwalking into another pensions scandal.
Richard Nobbs
Excalibur Actuaries

View the original on The Guardian →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.