InquirerPuerto Princesa braces for more grass fires amid super El NiñoESPNNHL Tonight: Capitals face Hurricanes in a critical early-season clashESPN DeportesRodgers y McCarthy tienen altercado durante juegoThe Jerusalem PostSaudi Arabia launched more than 90 attacks in Yemen in 24 hours, Houthis claim - reportRTP DesportoSporting SAD delibera em AG autorização para emitir empréstimos até 150 MEVarietyEuropean Entertainment Leaders Mostly Optimistic About David Ellison’s Takeover of Warner Bros. : ‘I Believe in His Commitment to Cinema’ZDF heuteEntdecken Sie das ZDF-NachrichtenstudioTechCrunchSean Parker is rebuilding Stability AI around musicEgyptian StreetsEish and Malḥ Between Us: a Musician on Cairo’s Shared Jewish TraditionsCBS SportsA plea to the Brewers this postseason: Act like the final boss, not 'The Little Engine That Could'Premium TimesZamfara @ 30: Gov Lawal commissions infrastructure projects, declares his rescue mission a successBBC News BrasilPF investiga suposto plano de atacar embaixada dos EUA: o que se sabe e como o governo brasileiro avalia
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Friday, October 2, 2026

Thames Water forced to apologise after blunder sees £145,000 taken from customer’s account

Translate

A family has spoken of its "shock" after a utility blunder led to £145,000 being erroneously withdrawn from a bank account.

Teacher Adam Bainbridge noticed the error during an early morning check on Thursday, discovering a £145,562 payment to Thames Water.

His wife, Julia, said he "got the shock of his life" and was "immediately in his overdraft, considerably."

She added: "It was pre-8am when we looked at the bank account.

"And, obviously then you try to do some ring rounds, no one’s online, no one’s answering any phones."

A chatbot initially advised the mistake would be fixed on the next payment, but Halifax subsequently restored the funds. Mrs Bainbridge added: "They have now returned the money."

Thames Water apologised "unreservedly" and said extra checks are being added to prevent similar incidents.

Mrs Bainbridge, a partner at a public relations firm, said of the £145,000 bill error: “It’s not easy if it happens to anybody, and we’re a family rushing around looking after a three-year-old trying to get ready for the nursery run and all the rest of it.

(Adam Bainbridge/PA)

(Adam Bainbridge/PA) (Adam Bainbridge/PA)

“But even more concerning is if you were a pensioner or not able to think about the various options, if you were in a more vulnerable position it would be absolutely terrifying and totally debilitating.

Trading 212 logo

Invest at least £100 in Stocks or ETFs of your choice. Get fractional shares worth £50!

Terms and conditions apply.

Go to website

ADVERTISEMENT

Invest at least £100 in Stocks or ETFs of your choice. Get fractional shares worth £50!

Terms and conditions apply.

Go to website

ADVERTISEMENT

“As it was this morning, Adam had some bills he wanted to pay off his card and things that were due out of his account and everything was blocked. It’s such a staggering amount of money.”

Mrs Bainbridge questioned how such a significant amount of money could be debited from her husband’s account in the first place, adding that this was supposed to be a “monthly” payment.

Mr Bainbridge said that when he saw the debit he felt “really shocked, because you don’t feel in control of what’s being taken from your account.

“It seemed that the numbers being calculated had absolutely nothing to do with reality at all. We’re a residential house in north London.”

Mr Bainbridge said: “It just seems that the billing is completely detached from reality.”

A Thames Water spokesperson said: “We apologise unreservedly to Mr Bainbridge and his family. This was the result of human error originating from an incorrect meter reading.

“We can confirm the money has been returned to Mr Bainbridge’s bank account and we have spoken to him today to say sorry.

“We are introducing additional checks to our processes to prevent this from happening again.

“We have also offered Mr Bainbridge a gesture of goodwill and are continuing to work with him to ensure the matter is fully resolved.”

In terms of direct debits generally, Halifax said mandates relating to these payments are held by the organisation collecting the payment, rather than by customers’ banks.

It said the amount to be collected is determined by the provider and a direct debit guarantee gives consumers protection against any errors made when a direct debit is taken.

View the original on The Independent →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.