Daily MaverickWHAT’S COOKING: Chow Mein — the history and how to make itPunchWomen can rule Nigeria, says NRM presidential candidateThe Jerusalem PostTwo elections, one relationship: What the votes mean for US-Israel ties- opinionBollywood HungamaRamayana 3 on the cards? Namit Malhotra says makers may revisit plans after audience feedbackObservador DesportoMorreu futebolista espanhol atingido por entrada violentaZDF heuteAktuelle Pressemitteilungen des ZDFХабрAI Assisted Development или как не убить кучу времени на код-ревью агентовColliderHarry Potter Officially Returns on November 17South China Morning Post‘At some point it’s going to be too much’: global financiers grapple with AI risksGIGAZINEバックグラウンドで動作するAIエージェント用のメールっぽい受信箱「Pizza Bot」、Windows/macOS/Linuxに対応したセルフホスト型のデスクトップアプリでローカルAIモデルなどあらゆるAIモデルに対応して通知によるアクション管理が可能The RegisterEveryone has the file. Nobody has the right version.הידעןסערת בוריס: שינויי האקלים מגבירים שיטפונות יותר משהם מגבירים את הגשם
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Tuesday, November 3, 2026

Your say: week beginning November 2

Translate

From the Editors

Notes from The Conversation newsroom

Johner Images/Getty Images, Dave Hoefler/Unsplash, The Conversation

Every day, we publish a selection of your emails in our newsletter. We’d love to hear from you, you can email us at yoursay@theconversation.edu.au.

Monday November 2

“Your article ‘Friday essay: forget Big Brother, propaganda is now a form of hybrid warfare’ was sobering. It describes the erosion of democracy, as shared public spaces are replaced by the isolated virtual villages we now inhabit, increasingly filled with propaganda. Yet the author concludes by advocating 'common sense and a commitment to plain speaking’ – two of the most easily manipulated concepts in undermining civility and democracy. Throughout history, ‘common sense’ has served as a convenient disguise for beliefs unsupported by evidence, from a flat Earth to all forms of bigotry. Appealing to ‘common sense’ won’t save us; it never has.”

Andrew Holliday

“Regarding your article, ‘Exempting pensioners from private health rebates won’t make it fairer’, might it be better to first investigate who actually has private health insurance? I can’t imagine many low-income earners can afford it. I’m a 74-year-old pensioner with only extras cover, which I often question, as the benefits barely seem worth the premiums. When I was working, I could never work out whether I was eligible for the rebate or how to claim it. I understand private cover may offer quicker access to specialists and surgery, but why do we need it when we have Medicare?”

View the original on The Conversation →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.