ESPN DeportesMillwall vs. West Ham, una rivalidad que inspiró una películaInquirerBarbers: Senate has final say on VP Sara conviction thresholdThe Jerusalem PostPentagon's US-Iran war fatality accounting may be inaccurate - reportESPN🏀 Experts debate Enes Kanter Freedom's WNBA bidBBC MundoTrump anuncia un acuerdo con Dinamarca por el que EE.UU. asumirá el "control permanente de la seguridad" de GroenlandiaRadio-CanadaÉlections au Québec : les chefs prennent la parole au sommet de l’UMQDigital SpyCoronation Street star Jack P Shepherd reveals secret about his Instagram DMsוואלהתושב מזרח ירושלים נעצר בחשד לרצח; גופת אישה אותרה במהלך החיפושים אחר נעדרתVarietyOscar Predictions: Best Adapted Screenplay — Epics, Trilogies and a Wild Dinner Party Could Define the RaceBBC SportKane makes history and Olise nets hat-trick as Bayern thrash UnionThe IndependentHealey planning high street revival with small business tax cuts in first BudgetDeadline‘Resident Evil’ Scaring Up $50M+ U.S. Franchise Record Opening – Update
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Friday, September 18, 2026

Bishop: 39 years long enough, pass anti-dynasty law

Translate

MANILA, Philippines — It’s been a long wait for Congress to pass an anti-dynasty law, Caloocan Bishop Pablo Virgilio David said yesterday, as he stressed that lawmakers should heed the order of the Supreme Court (SC).

“Thirty-nine years is long enough. Congress, the Supreme Court has spoken. Now enact the law,” David said.

The SC has granted the consolidated petitions for certiorari and mandamus questioning the legislature’s failure for 39 years to approve an enabling law against political dynasties, stressing that the failure constitutes “grave abuse of discretion.”

“That is how long Congress has failed to implement the provision required by the 1987 Constitution to prohibit political dynasties,” David added.

The SC unanimously ruled that Congress is mandated to enact a law barring political dynasties under Article 2, Section 26 of the Constitution.

It regarded Congress’ failure to enact the law as a “refusal to perform a mandatory constitutional duty.”

“For almost four decades, the constitutional command remained largely unrealized because Congress itself was entrusted with defining what constitutes a political dynasty. The Court noted that dynasties have meanwhile remained widespread, extending even into the party-list system,” he added.

The 1987 Constitution explicitly seeks the prohibition of political dynasties as may be defined by law.

“Perhaps this ruling raises a question larger than political dynasties themselves: what happens when those entrusted with making the law have a personal interest in not making it?” David noted.

Malacañang earlier said that banning political dynasties remains a priority of the Marcos administration.

View the original on The Philippine Star

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.